Hamilton Capital Management - Registered Investment Advisor

Blog

Hamilton Capital Blog
May 8, 2013

Caxide Offers Performance Insights And Guidance To Directors At OAMIC Convention

Hamilton Capital Chief Investment Officer Tony Caxide recently served as a speaker at the Ohio Association of Mutual Insurance Companies' (OAMIC) 134th annual convention.

A former insurance company chief investment officer, Caxide offered insights on performance and evaluation during his presentations entitled "Insurance-Specific Performance Metrics" and "Understanding the Audit Committee Role."

"It is very rewarding to help the management of these companies leverage each other's strengths and guide their investment portfolios through today's market volatility to create the best possible outcomes for their policyholders," said Caxide. "It was an honor to be a part of the covention and to receive the positive response we did from the many executives, directors and agents who attended."
Submit a Question/Comment
Have an advisor contact me
Comments
Blog post currently doesn't have any comments.
Leave comment



Enter security code:
 Security code
April 8, 2013

It's Different This Time...

By Eric Shisler, CFA®
Typically this headline would cause the hair on our neck to stand up. In an industry that frequently echoes Mark Twain’s quote, “History may not repeat itself, but it rhymes”, we become immediately skeptical. Is someone trying to sell a ‘new’ investment product or process? Do they have a ‘guaranteed’ way to double your income? Whatever follows this headline should be subject to the highest level of scrutiny.
We’re using it to give context to headlines you may have read or heard in the media on April 1 (not an April Fool’s Day prank, by the way). On the last day of the quarter (March 28), the S&P 500 set a new closing high. While a milestone, we’re in a price range that’s not that much higher than levels we’ve experienced twice before (as the green circles in the graph below show). And after a quick glance at the solid line (S&P 500 price), one may become concerned about what happens after the market reaches these levels. Twice in the last 15 years the market has fallen when prices got to these levels. So why not again?  The reason we say it may be different this time is corporate earnings (profits).
The chart below captures the price of the S&P 500 (solid) and the collective profits of corporate America (dashed line) as defined by the National Income Accounts, a broad measure of corporate earnings calculated by the federal government’s Bureau of Economic Analysis. The first time we witnessed current price levels was in early 2000, influenced heavily by the “dot-coms’” stratospheric prices and the frenzy surrounding anything having to do with the Internet. At that time, price appreciation in the S&P 500 was driven in large part by expectations of what corporate profits could grow to rather than what was actually achieved, which was meaningfully lower (yellow bar). A similar pattern emerged in the mid-2000s, but did not quite pan out then either.

untitled.JPG

The reason we believe the current price level is different than these previous instances is because earnings support the S&P 500 (third circle and bar set) much more closely than before. Earnings are the backbone of stock prices, and while we know price appreciation and earnings growth may diverge, especially over relatively short periods of time, the two are inextricably related over the long term. 
Looking forward, we see many reasons why earnings can continue to grow at a moderate rate. The growth, however, is seldom smooth and numerous issues/events could cause volatility in earnings and lead us to change our view. And there’s no guarantee that prices will follow in lock step. But for now, the new highs we’re seeing in corporate profits make current price levels much more justifiable than before, and thus, it really is different this time.      
 
Submit a Question/Comment
Have an advisor contact me
Comments
Blog post currently doesn't have any comments.
Leave comment



Enter security code:
 Security code
January 24, 2013

The Hardest Thing Was To "Remain Invested"

By Tony Caxide, CFA®
The post-mortem for 2012 is in and the surprise is… markets did very well.
If, one year ago, we had told you that we had perfect foresight about economic and political events, and we were to describe all of the global scares of 2012 – from Greece to the “fiscal cliff” – most would have been compelled to anticipate tragedy and believe the Mayan calendar. Alas, the world did not come to an end after all. It was a trying year indeed, full of doubts. Investors were nervous some of the time and despondent much of the rest, even as performance gradually, if fitfully, accumulated.
The hardest thing was to keep your hands off the controls. Of course, we say that figuratively. It took a lot of research, analysis and debate to stay the course, remain invested and overweight so-called “risk assets” like stocks and high-yield (or “junk”) bonds. But that’s what we do every day for you.
A Needed Year of Performance
Some individual investors, with other lives to live, still found it hard to keep the TV tuned to Downton Abbey rather than the financial channels; ignore screaming headlines rather than react with more and more twitches; and remain invested in higher-risk asset classes – which did quite well – rather than in traditional safe plays like cash, treasury bonds and investment-grade bonds – all of which failed to measure up. In the name of playing it safe (‘…why don’t we wait until things calm down…?’) many investors missed a year of performance that one absolutely needs to be part of in order to reach their financial goals.
Wall Street Got It Wrong
 
They were in good company. Many experts hesitated as well, as The Wall Street Journal reported in "Almost All Wall Street Got 2012 Wrong as Markets Saved World" (January 4, 2013). Even the former wunderkind of the investment world - hedge funds - struggled yet again. As of the end of November, global macro hedge funds, which fundamentally do what we do at sharply higher fees (annual 2% of assets and 20% of any portfolio return in excess of treasury bills is typical), had returned in the range of 3% for the year. Not so stunning after all and well below the return experienced by the majority of our clients. Most of our portfolios returned in the range of mid-teens (for growth-oriented equity focused strategies Dynamic Equity, Balanced Growth, Dynamic Growth, and Opportunity Growth) to the high single digits (for total return taxable fixed income-focused strategies Dynamic Bond and Balanced Income), considering expenses.
More Vigilance Ahead
It’s in our nature to look back only fleetingly, and remain focused on what’s ahead as we speed down the road, lest we run over a big pothole. The next two months could lead to even scarier headlines with debt ceilings, “sequestration” (automatic spending cuts) and the end of spending authority on deck. Some day the disciples of doom will be right. We’re watching carefully to assess whether it will be this time, or if this is yet another opportunity we cannot afford to miss.
 
 
Submit a Question/Comment
Have an advisor contact me
Comments
Blog post currently doesn't have any comments.
Leave comment



Enter security code:
 Security code
November 6, 2012

It's Earnings That Matter

By Jeff Liu, MBA, CFA®
One of the best-performing global asset classes through the end of September has been U.S. large-company stocks. Our strategies have maintained meaningful overweights in this asset class for several years based on its fundamental attractiveness relative to other global asset classes we closely follow each day.    And since it’s earnings season again, we’re getting yet another data-point in our ongoing assessment of this asset class and others.
As of November 1, 373 S&P 500 companies have reported Q3 results. The signal is mixed: about 71% beat analysts’ earnings expectations, but about 54% also missed sales forecasts. The market is a bit nervous now – worried that slowing revenue growth could eventually bite into earnings. That “jitteriness” is understandable even though these U.S. large-company stocks still trade at a price/earnings (P/E) multiple of 14.3 times – lower than the post-war historical average of 16.4. At this point, the future direction of earnings growth, rather than P/E, appears to be having a stronger impact on the direction of these stocks and the broader stock market. 
The graph below shows that a change in earnings direction (as measured by our preferred National Income Accounts, or NIA measure) usually triggers the market to follow suit. Often this occurs within several months to a year, but it can take much longer, as we saw during the tech bubble era in the late ‘90s. Some of the factors that favor and go against future robust earnings growth include:
Pros:
  • The Federal Reserve and other monetary authorities globally are maintaining a very accommodative monetary policy that’s still very supportive of earnings growth.
  • With low interest rates, it’s easier than ever for U.S. companies to raise money in the debt market to finance growth. Even the junk bond market is flooded with money seeking higher yields (the record for junk bonds issued in the U. S. in a single year was broken on October 18, according to Dealogic).
  • Enterprises can still keep labor costs low – in the range of a 1.8% annual increase in the latest reading. Labor costs represent about 70% of U.S. company expenses.
Cons:
  • The continued eurozone crisis and a slowing of emerging-market economies hamper demand – probably the main culprit of the recent slowdown in sales growth.
  • The aging population in some emerging countries like China gradually reduces the cheap labor source for multi-national companies.
  • Right now domestic U.S. profit margins stand more than 50 percent above their long-term average. Some argue that the law of “reversion to mean” will eventually drive margins, and profits, down.
The arguments above show that more short/medium-term factors appear to favor profit growth while some longer-term factors suggest a moderation. Our in-house research on NIA profit and profit margins suggests a similar conclusion: NIA earnings should slow from the rapid pace of recent years, but should grow moderately over the next 12-24 months.   It also suggests we may see some volatility in earnings near term. However, we’ve yet to see evidence of a meaningful pull back in earnings. Therefore we believe earnings levels support the current price level of U.S. large-company stocks in the absence of some headline risks (e.g., a possible mishandling of the fiscal cliff).  Based on this, we continue to maintain an overweight position in U.S. large-company stocks in our portfolios.

Graph:

 
png-chart.PNG

 
 
Submit a Question/Comment
Have an advisor contact me
Comments
Blog post currently doesn't have any comments.
Leave comment



Enter security code:
 Security code
September 12, 2012

Honk Honk

By Eric G. Shisler, CFA
That isn’t an impatient driver behind you, and it’s too early for geese to start their southern migration. No, that’s the sound of us tooting our horn a bit. Here’s why:
 
Active Management
The key determinant of your long-term returns is the asset classes in which your portfolio invests. You will remember asset classes become more or less attractive as economic and financial markets conditions change. With that in mind, we diligently research, compare, and contrast economies and markets around the globe seeking to identify these changes as they emerge.
Rather than maintain a static allocation to asset classes as so many advisers have done, we then apply our research to the portfolio management process, leading us to over- or under-weight certain markets – all in an effort to provide an attractive, long-term, risk-adjusted rate of return.

These adjustments, at the asset-class level, can have great impact. How has our process worked? A visit to our website to review recent Investment Highlights offers a glimpse.
 

  • On June 11, 2011, in a piece titled Reducing Exposure to Small Cap Stocks, we wrote, “After a recent update of our forecasts for future earnings streams, we’ve decided to reduce our exposure to small cap stocks, which we feel are expensive relative to traditional small cap fundamentals (e.g., earnings and P/E multiples). In exchange, we’re further increasing our investment in larger companies.” What’s happened since? From June 13, 2011 (June 11 was a Saturday) through August 31, 2012, the Russell 2000 small cap index provided a total return of 6.4% while the S&P 500 large cap index has provided an 13.6% total return.

  • On October 10, 2011, in a piece titled Short-Term Correction: Strong Opportunity Over Next 24 Months, we wrote, “In fact, with the recent correction, the S&P 500 is now trading at its most fundamentally attractive level since the U.S. economic recovery began. We estimate that prices are now more than 30% below their intrinsic values, creating opportunity for the patient investor.” In this case, from October 10, 2011 through August 31, 2012, the S&P 500 provided a 20.1% total return.

 Balance Volatility With Expected Performance Across Many Alternatives

The path is never smooth and we are keenly aware of daily volatility. We read the same headlines and CNBC is a constant in our break room, so we’re hearing all the hype, too.1 We often find the hype revolves around specific investment ideas which, not surprisingly, seem to be ideas offered by “expert” guests who either benefit from selling the idea or already own it and benefit if more investors buy in. More often it’s simpler than that. If it’s bad news, it sells. As the old news business adage goes, “If it bleeds, it leads.”

Pitches to investors in the current media range from individual securities to portfolio management processes to specialized asset classes to new investment products and more. Take Hedge funds. A few years ago, many claimed they were the answer to volatile markets. Fast forward to today and many have failed to do their job, leaving many investors either forced to remove principal when the fund closes or locked out of withdrawing their now-depleted money. 

Another idea stemmed from the observation that many economies are growing faster than the U.S.  Assumptions were then drawn that every investor should always maintain an international exposure. That worked for a while, but markets aren’t static. Our research, after a detailed assessment of many non-U.S. developed and emerging market alternatives, currently has us favoring the U.S.   As of August 31, the S&P 500 has a total year-to-date return of about 13.5%, while the MSCI World Excluding United States index has posted an approximately 7.1% total return.2 Sure, the volatility sometimes feels like it’s going to drive you to drink.  But, in spite of it, the U.S. equity market is one of the top-performing markets not only on a year-to-date basis, but also over the past 12 months.    

While we boast every now and again, we actually remain very humble in our portfolio management process. We remember the ‘pain’ of incorrect decisions, too.  But, by applying our ongoing research discipline and seeking to improve it every day, we believe the gains from our correct decisions will out-weigh the impact of the others over the long-term.

Footnotes:

1 News outlets make money selling time and/or space, so to fill both they tend to sensationalize everything whether it deserves it or not.  

2 In strategies where we invest in equities, Hamilton Capital is currently overweighting large cap U.S. equities relative to our neutral allocations per strategy. However, in an effort to reduce long-term volatility, we also are currently allocated in U.S. mid cap, U.S. small cap, and emerging markets, which have not performed as well as large cap U.S. equities in the time frames mentioned in this piece. Relative to our neutral allocations, we are underweight in these asset classes. Performance of individual asset classes is available upon request.  

Submit a Question/Comment
Have an advisor contact me
Comments
Blog post currently doesn't have any comments.
Leave comment



Enter security code:
 Security code
Bookmark and Share

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service

Copyright © 2011 Hamilton Capital Management. All rights reserved.